>> (PORTFOLIO) Scott VS. TESLA MOTORS, ET AL

Scott Douglas Redmond is also a credentialed expert forensic investigator. He, and his team, have contributed case evidence, criminal referrals, background reports and effective resources to numerous criminal corruption investigations. In his past cases, he has created new laws and case precedents to make it ever harder for the corrupt to practice their schemes. He encourages every member of the public to learn forensic technologies and join the crowd-sourced efforts to end the bribery, payola, stock market skims, trafficking ‘gifts’, revolving door graft, insider trading conduits, and other corruption that runs politics in America. Suggested reading, for ANY member of the public to learn how to be a “Corruption Buster’, can be found on the READING LIST (LINK) on this page.

 

 

 

EXPERT WITNESS AND CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCHER


 

SCOTT’S LIVE, TELEVISED, CONGRESSIONAL HEARING CHALLENGE: IS TESLA MOTORS A CRMINALLY CORRUPT COMPANY FORGED IN BRIBES AND CRONYISM?

Scott will bring 20 Senators, six published authors, six FBI agents, six FINCEN agents and six forensic scientists and go HEAD-TO-HEAD, in front of the United States Congress, with ANY insiders who deny any fact on this page!

BRING IT!

 

 


 

TO FIX THE SYSTEM; DO THE MATH:

## Bribes paid to politicians, including search engine rigging, shadow-bans, covert stock trades, etc;  to maintain their MONOPOLIES, and avoid regulation, paid by Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = $22 Billion+

## Offshore tax evasion and money laundering by Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = $2 Trillion+

## Lobbying money, including placing their own executives in control of the main government office, to control the United States Patent Office for the exclusive protection benefit of Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = $42 Billion+

## Exclusive ‘favored nations’ cash and contracts from the government in exchange for bribes and stock manipulations for Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = $120 Billion+

## Percentage of Congress that covertly owns the business of Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = 98%

## Number of lobbyists and political manipulation operatives working for Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = 520+

## Number of Cyber-Assassination services like Fusion GPS, Black Cube, The Agency, etc, working for Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures = 1280+

## Number of times Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures have violated the privacy and data rights of Americans = Hundreds of Millions of Times

## Amount of money Musk, Google, Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, Sony Pictures has cost the government/taxpayers in failed efforts and losses = $600 Million+
## Amount of money Scott has SAVED the government/taxpayers = $700 million+

Details, and proof, on the numbers, above, always available in live, televised, Congressional hearings…

Scott says that law firms willing to sue the ‘bad guys’ in jury trials, on a contingency fee basis, are always welcome to reach out and propose an arrangement!

Who has hasn’t dreamed of an electric car that can solve all of America’s energy problems, gets all of it’s fuel from clean sources INSIDE of America, is the safest car ever made, is affordable to the average person and relies on no foreign sourcing? The United States Patent Office and public records say one of Scott’s company’s did it first! …To further verify the assertion: Scott was awarded nearly a billion dollars of issued patents in commendation for his role as the seminal inventor by the United States Patent Office …Congress awarded Scott a Congressional award for his energy technology in The Iraq War Bill …AND The United States Government contracted Scott’s company to build it….. BUT then the Government officials sabotaged the whole thing, including all the patents and the rest of Scott’s funding because it was about to obsolete their insider trading car: The Tesla. The deadly, stock market pump-and-dumped, exploding, very defective: “Tesla”. Law enforcement and news investigators then informed Scott he had been defrauded by a government scam and insider crony slush-fund. Scott’s patented electric car technology solved the biggest problems with electric cars. Anybody who has ever rented an electric car for a four day trip knows that you have to spend more time charging it than you do sleeping. Nobody that lives in apartments can get one because they have no home charging. Scott’s 5 second hot swap cassettes eliminates those issues for hundreds of millions of people. Competing industries, and politicians that own Tesla, hate that reality.

… AND THEN ELON MUSK, AND POLITICIANS THAT HE BRIBES, SENT ACTUAL MEDIA HIT-MEN AFTER SCOTT BECAUSE SCOTT’S ELECTRIC CAR WAS OBSOLETING MUSK’S DEFECTIVE CAR THAT 1/3 OF CONGRESS OWNED THE STOCK IN:

SEE THIS VIDEO:

 

Video Player

 

THEN SEE THIS VIDEO:

 

Video Player

THEN SEE THE NEW FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS AND LAWSUITS AROUND ELON’S DIRTY DEEDS:

THEN READ THE CHARGES AGAINST MUSK IN THESE LAWSUITS:

Musk, Elon CASE #: 0:2019pr01577 Derrick Galvin v. Wendy Kelley, et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 03/20/2019 07/25/2019
Musk, Elon CASE #: 0:2014cv17501 Kazim Acar, et al v. Tesla Motors, Inc., et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 12/22/2014 12/21/2016
Musk, Elon CASE #: 0:2019op70031 Bridgestone Investment Corp. v. USDC-CASF U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 01/04/2019 10/08/2019
Musk, Elon CASE #: 0:2019cv15672 Gregory Wochos, et al v. Tesla, Inc., et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 04/08/2019 01/26/2021
Musk, Elon CASE #: 0:2019cv16735 John Olagues, et al v. Elon Musk, et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 09/05/2019 12/05/2019
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 5:2018cv00316 Galvin v. Kelley et al Arkansas Eastern District Court 12/19/2018 02/20/2019
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2015cv01620 Gabriella Lukas v. Elon Musk California Central District Court 03/05/2015 03/12/2015
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2018cv08048 Vernon Unsworth v. Elon Musk California Central District Court 09/17/2018 12/06/2019
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 2:2018cv07575 Shahram Sodeifi v. Tesla Inc et al California Central District Court 08/30/2018 09/24/2018
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2020cv02353 Robert Lee Manning Jr. v. Space Explorations Technologies Corporation et al California Central District Court 03/11/2020 03/23/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2020cv06448 Lisa Douglass v. United States of America et al California Central District Court 07/20/2020 09/10/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 8:2020cv01376 Edwin R. Moran v. Face Book et al California Central District Court 07/28/2020 08/06/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2021cv08561 Curtis Adler v. Elon Musk et al California Central District Court 10/29/2021 04/15/2022
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2013cv05216 In Re Tesla Motors, Inc. Securities Litigation California Northern District Court 11/08/2013 12/05/2014
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2013cv05438 Magnisalias v. Tesla Motors, Inc et al California Northern District Court 11/22/2013 01/30/2014
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 5:2014cv01435 Bao v. SolarCity Corporation et al California Northern District Court 03/28/2014 08/09/2016
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2014cv02817 Ross Weintraub v. Elon Musk et al California Northern District Court 06/18/2014 10/10/2014
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2014cv02820 Stastny v. Rive et al California Northern District Court 06/18/2014 07/03/2014
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 3:2017cv05828 Wochos v. Tesla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 10/10/2017 03/25/2019
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv04865 In re Tesla Inc. Securities Litigation California Northern District Court 08/10/2018
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv04876 Chamberlain v. Tesla, Inc., et al California Northern District Court 08/10/2018
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv04912 Yeager v. Tesla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 08/13/2018
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv04939 Maia v. Musk et al California Northern District Court 08/14/2018
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv04948 Dua v. Tesla Inc. et al California Northern District Court 08/15/2018
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv05258 Horwitz v. Tesla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 08/28/2018
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv05463 Left v. Tesla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 09/06/2018
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv05470 Fan v. Tesla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 09/06/2018
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv05899 Shahram Sodeifi v. Tesla Inc et al California Northern District Court 09/26/2018
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 5:2018cv07110 Olagues et al v. Musk et al California Northern District Court 11/21/2018 07/31/2019
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2018cv07325 Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT v. Tesla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 12/04/2018 04/15/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2019mc80224 Unsworth v. Musk California Northern District Court 09/13/2019 07/19/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2020cv03426 Greenspan v. Qazi et al California Northern District Court 05/20/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 4:2020cv08055 Eberwein v. Villarnos et al California Northern District Court 11/16/2020 01/20/2021
Musk, Elon (pla) CASE #: 3:2021mc80277 Tesla Motors, Inc. et al v. Balan California Northern District Court 11/24/2021 12/02/2021
Musk, Elon (pet) CASE #: 4:2021cv09325 Tesla Motors, Inc. et al v. Balan California Northern District Court 12/02/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2019cv02407 Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al California Southern District Court 12/16/2019 06/01/2020
MUSK, ELON (dft) CASE #: 1:2022cv00906 ADESHINA v. BUSH et al District Of Columbia District Court 04/01/2022
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2017cv00317 In re: Tesla, Inc. Stockholder Litigation Delaware District Court 03/24/2017
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2017cv00461 Arkansas Teacher Retirement System et al v. Musk et al Delaware District Court 04/21/2017
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2018cv01669 In re Tesla, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation Delaware District Court 10/25/2018
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2019cv00298 Klein v. Musk et al Delaware District Court 02/11/2019
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 5:2021cv00296 Bennett v. Brown et al Florida Middle District Court 05/28/2021 06/07/2021
MUSK, ELON (dft) CASE #: 4:2021cv00403 ADESHINA v. MUSK et al Florida Northern District Court 10/04/2021 01/05/2022
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 0:2020cv61520 Smith v Garcia et al Florida Southern District Court 07/27/2020 07/30/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 0:2020cv61545 Smith v. Rodriguez et al Florida Southern District Court 07/30/2020 07/31/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2020cv23303 Smith v. Musk et al Florida Southern District Court 08/07/2020 07/22/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 0:2020cv61606 Smith v. Garcia et al Florida Southern District Court 08/07/2020 08/11/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 4:2020cv10097 Smith v. Musk et al Florida Southern District Court 08/17/2020 08/28/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 0:2020cv62387 Smith v. Musk et al Florida Southern District Court 11/23/2020 11/24/2020
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE # 1:2021cv02263 Williams v. Musk Georgia Northern District Court 06/02/2021 07/15/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2021cv04260 Nakamoto et al v. The United States et al Georgia Northern District Court 10/08/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2022cv03003 Nyama v. Musk Iowa Northern District Court 01/14/2022 02/25/2022
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2021cv10149 Smith v. Monroe Engineering Products, LLC et al Michigan Eastern District Court 01/21/2021 01/25/2021
MUSK, ELON (dft) CASE #: 1:2017cv00635 MOHAMMAD v. JOINES, et al North Carolina Middle District Court 07/07/2017 08/30/2017
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2019cv00413 Hansen v. Musk et al Nevada District Court 07/19/2019
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 2:2021cv01710 Young et al v. Zuckerberg et al Nevada District Court 09/16/2021 11/09/2021
Musk, Elon Reeve (dft) CASE #: 1:2015cv06756 Adams v. Musk et al New York Eastern District Court 11/24/2015 05/11/2016
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2018cv08865 United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Musk New York Southern District Court 09/27/2018 10/16/2018
Musk, Elon R. (dft) CASE #: 1:2022cv03026 Rasella v. Musk New York Southern District Court 04/12/2022
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 3:2021cv00139 Boileau et al v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. et al Tennessee Middle District Court 02/19/2021 08/26/2021
Musk, Elon (dft) CASE #: 1:2020cv01176 Saturn v. Austin Bergstrom International Airport et al Texas Western District Court
THE_CRIMES_AND_LIES_OF_ELON_MUSK (LINK)

And that’s not even a tiny bit of the charges against Musk….

There are a vast volume of other similar examples of “Firsts” created and placed on the market by Scott  and then spied-on, stolen and copied By The NVCA Tech Cartel who then launched harms against Scott’s team because Scott refused to participate in their protection rackets and reported them to the FBI, SEC, FEC, FTC, FINCEN and The DOJ..

Then read the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF NEWS REPORTS ABOUT ELON AND HIS LIES AND ATTACKS ON COMPETITORS…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TESLA CARS CRASH THEMSELVES ON THEIR OWN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE_CRIMES_AND_LIES_OF_ELON_MUSK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SpaceX employees draft open letter to company executives denouncing Elon Musk’s constant violation of the Company ‘No Asshole’ policy

‘Every Tweet that Elon sends is a de facto public statement by the company’

By Loren Grush@lorengrush

An open letter to SpaceX decrying CEO Elon Musk’s recent behavior has sparked open discussion among thecompany’s employees in an internal chat system. Employees are being encouraged to sign onto the letter’s suggestions, either publiclyor anonymously, with a signed version of the letter to be delivered to the desk of SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell.

The letter, reviewed by The Verge, describes how Musk’s actions and the recent allegations of sexualharassment against him are negatively affecting SpaceX’s reputation. The document claims that employees “across the spectraof gender, ethnicity, seniority, and technical roles have collaborated on” writing the letter. It’s not known which SpaceXemployees wrote the letter; the employees who posted the letter in the internal chat system have not responded to requests for comment.

“Elon’s behavior in the public sphere is a frequent source of distraction and embarrassment”

“Elon’s behavior in the public sphere is a frequent source of distraction and embarrassment for us,particularly in recent weeks,” the letter states. “As our CEO and most prominent spokesperson, Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX —every Tweet that Elon sends is a de facto public statement by the company. It is critical to make clear to our teams and to ourpotential talent pool that his messaging does not reflect our work, our mission, or our values.”

Musk has been doing a lot recently, and his presence on Twitter can be particularly crass. In April, he shared an image of Bill Gates and anemoji of a pregnant man, captioned with “in case u need to lose a boner fast.” Last year, he also responded to a tweet about JeffBezos’ aerospace company Blue Origin, saying “Can’t get it up (to orbit) lol.” Musk is also currently attempting to buy Twitter.

Shared on Wednesday in an internal SpaceX Microsoft Teams channel with more than 2,600 employees, the letterargues that the company is not living up to its oft-stated “No Asshole” policy and its zero-tolerance sexual harassment policy.The document goes on to suggest three different “action items” to address the situation: SpaceX should “publicly address and condemnElon’s harmful Twitter behavior”; the company should “hold all leadership equally accountable” for bad behavior; and SpaceX needsto “clearly define what exactly is intended by SpaceX’s ‘no-asshole’ and ‘zero tolerance’ policies and enforce themconsistently.”

“Every Tweet that Elon sends is a de facto public statement by the company”

The number of signatures was not immediately available, but employees were asked to sign onto the letter byfilling out a survey or scanning a QR code. The letter generated more than a hundred comments in the Teams channel, with many employeesagreeing to the spirit of the missive, according to screenshots of the chat shared by two sources who spoke with The Verge and asked to remain anonymous. Some commenters also claimed to beembarrassed by Musk’s behavior. Others expressed a desire for the company to better address executive leadershipbehavior as well as sexual harassment complaints.

The letter comes nearly a month after a report from Insider alleged that SpaceX paid a former company flight attendant a $250,000 settlement after she accused Musk of exposing himself to her and propositioning her during a massage, an allegation thatinvolved Musk offering to buy her a horse. Musk denied the allegations, telling Insider there is “a lot more to this story.”

“If I were inclined to engage in sexual harassment, this is unlikely to be the first time in my entire30-year career that it comes to light,” he told the outlet. On Twitter, Musk joked about the story in a tweet reply: “Hi Chad, long time no see! Fine, if you touch mywiener, you can have a horse.”

After the story came out, Shotwell sent a company-wide email to SpaceX employees defending Musk. “Personally, I believe the allegations to be false; not because Iwork for Elon, but because I have worked closely with him for 20 years and never seen nor heard anything resembling theseallegations,” Shotwell wrote. “Anyone who knows Elon like I do, knows he would never conduct or condone this alleged inappropriatebehavior.”

This isn’t the first time that the topic of sexual harassment at SpaceX has surfaced. In December, a formerSpaceX employee wrote an essay on the platform Lioness detailing her experience with what she described as pervasive sexual harassment at the company. Shealso criticized SpaceX’s HR response to her complaints. The Verge spoke with four additional former SpaceX employees at the time, all of whom argued that the company’s HR department improperly handled harassment complaints. Before the story came out,Shotwell emailed the company reiterating the “No Asshole” policy.

“We also know we can always do better,” Shotwell wrote in December. “That is why HR has been solicitingfeedback from groups across the company to ensure the process is effective. HR will also conduct an internal audit, followed by athird-party audit.”

A copy of the letter can be read below:


An open letter to the Executives of SpaceX,

In light of recent allegations against our CEO and his public disparagement of the situation, we would like to deliver feedback onhow these events affect our company’s reputation, and through it, our mission. Employees across the spectra of gender, ethnicity,seniority, and technical roles have collaborated on this letter. We feel it is imperative to maintain honest and open dialogue with eachother to effectively reach our company’s primary goals together: making SpaceX a great place to work for all, and making humans amultiplanetary species.

As SpaceX employees we are expected to challenge established processes, rapidly innovate to solve complex problems as a team, anduse failures as learning opportunities. Commitment to these ideals is fundamental to our identity and is core to how we have redefined ourindustry. But for all our technical achievements, SpaceX fails to apply these principles to the promotion of diversity, equity, andinclusion with equal priority across the company, resulting in a workplace culture that remains firmly rooted in the status quo.

Individuals and groups of employees at SpaceX have spent significant effort beyond their technical scope to make the company amore inclusive space via conference recruiting, open forums, feedback to leadership, outreach, and more. However, we feel an unequal burdento carry this effort as the company has not applied appropriate urgency and resources to the problem in a manner consistent with ourapproach to critical path technical projects. To be clear: recent events are not isolated incidents; they are emblematic of a widerculture that underserves many of the people who enable SpaceX’s extraordinary accomplishments. As industry leaders, we bear uniqueresponsibility to address this.

Elon’s behavior in the public sphere is a frequent source of distraction and embarrassment for us, particularly in recent weeks.As our CEO and most prominent spokesperson, Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX—every Tweet that Elon sends is a de facto publicstatement by the company. It is critical to make clear to our teams and to our potential talent pool that his messaging does not reflectour work, our mission, or our values.

SpaceX’s current systems and culture do not live up to its stated values, as many employees continue to experience unequalenforcement of our oft-repeated “No Asshole” and “Zero Tolerance” policies. This must change. As a starting point, we areputting forth the following categories of action items, the specifics of which we would like to discuss in person with the executive teamwithin a month:

Publicly address and condemn Elon’s harmful Twitter behavior. SpaceX must swiftly and explicitly separate itself from Elon’s personal brand.

Hold all leadership equally accountable to making SpaceX a great place to work for everyone. Apply a critical eye to issues that prevent employees from fully performing their jobs andmeeting their potential, pursuing specific and enduring actions that are well resourced, transparent, and treated with the same rigor andurgency as establishing flight rationale after a hardware anomaly.

Define and uniformly respond to all forms of unacceptable behavior. Clearly define what exactly is intended by SpaceX’s “no-asshole” and “zero tolerance” policies andenforce them consistently. SpaceX must establish safe avenues for reporting and uphold clear repercussions for all unacceptablebehavior, whether from the CEO or an employee starting their first day.

 

Elon Musk’s Electric Car Batteries Made By Forced Labor Overseas

Increasing ties have been found between the origin of the batteries needed to power the technology and forced labor in Chinese work camps.

Electric car batteries tied to forced labor in China: report
Jarryd Jaeger Vancouver, BC
As many environmentalists push for a quick transition to electric vehicles and clean energy, increasing ties have been found between the origin of the batteries needed to power the technology and forced labor in Chinese work camps. 
One province in particular, Xinjiang, is facing mounting criticism as more details emerge surrounding working conditions for members of the Uyghur Muslim minority.According to the New York Times, while China produces 75 percent of the world’s lithium ion batteries, much of the raw material is mined elsewhere. In recent years, however, the Chinese government has set their sights on controlling all aspects of the supply chain.
In order to compete with other countries, China has ramped up production in the western province of Xinjiang, home to the nation’s Uyghur Muslim minority. 
As the Times reports, companies such as Xinjiang Nonferrous Metal Industry Group have partnered with the Chinese government to move  hundreds of Uyghurs from the south to the industrialized north where they are put to work in mines, smelters, and factories producing lithium, nickel, manganese, beryllium, copper and gold.
While such companies deny that their workers are mistreated, reports show that Uyghurs are subject to what could easily be deemed to be forced labor. 
Uyghurs who refuse to work in accordance with Chinese government policies are often sent to internment camps, and in May it was revealed that many of those camps have a “shoot-to-kill” policy for those who attempt to escape.
Thus, the official claim that “all employment is voluntary” is not supported.

In addition to forced labor, Uyghurs are also subjected to re-education, wherein government-appointed “teachers” attempt to create loyal subjects to the nation and communist regime.

On June 21, a new law will go into effect in the United States called the “Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.” As NPR reports, it gives the US authority to seize goods produced in Xinjiang unless companies can prove they did not engage in forced labor practices.
Environmental realist, author, and California gubernatorial candidate Michael Shellenberger is one of many calling on the Biden administration to go one step further and ban the importation of all goods from Xinjiang. He says the US should instead focus on manufacturing green technology at home. 
As he points out, however, the decision would face pushback from both Democrats “who don’t want to slow the deployment of solar panels and electric cars in the US,” and “free market Republicans.” 
The world has shone a spotlight on the Chinese government’s treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, but it remains to be seen whether the Communist Party and the companies to which it is so closely tied will change their practices.

Electric car batteries tied to forced labor in China: report

Jarryd Jaeger Vancouver, BC June 20, 2022 7:16 PM 2 mins reading As many environmentalists push for a quick transition to electric vehicles and clean energy, increasing ties have been found between the origin of the batteries needed to power the technology and forced labor in Chinese work camps.

Red Flags for Forced Labor Found in China’s Car Battery Supply Chain

The apparel, food and solar industries have already been upended by reports linking their supply chains in Xinjiang to forced labor. Solar companies last year were forced to halt billions of dollars of projects as they investigated their supply chains.

Red Flags for Forced Labor Found in China’s Car Battery Supply Chain

China produces three-quarters of the world’s lithium ion batteries, and virtually all of the metals wanted to make them are processed there. Much of the fabric, although, is definitely mined elsewhere, in locations like Argentina, Australia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. … “Forced labor goods are making their way into a really …

Red Flags for Forced Labor Found in China’s Car Battery Supply Chain

“No one has been forced to become ‘transferred labor’ in Xinjiang,” Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, told reporters in Beijing this month. It is difficult to ascertain the…

Red Flags for Forced Labor Found in China’s Car Battery Supply Chain

“No one has been forced to become ‘transferred labor’ in Xinjiang,” Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, told reporters in Beijing this month. It is difficult to ascertain the level of coercion any individual worker has faced given the limited access to Xinjiang for journalists and research firms.
Images lithium batteries forced labor

Red Flags for Forced Labor Found in China’s Car Battery Supply Chain

In principle, the brand new U.S. legislation ought to block all items made with any uncooked supplies which might be related to Xinjiang till they’re confirmed to be freed from slavery or coercive labor practices. But it stays to be seen if the U.S. authorities is keen or in a position to flip away such an array of international items.

Red flags for forced labor found in China’s car battery supply chain

Red flags for forced labor found in China’s car battery supply chain. The entrance to an indoctrination center in Hotan, China on Aug. 4, 2019. In 2017, the regional government announced plans …

The Hidden Risks of Batteries: Child Labor, Modern Slavery, and …

Stefan Sabo-Walsh March 29, 2017 The Hidden Risks of Batteries: Child Labor, Modern Slavery, and Weakened Land and Water Rights 18 The meteoric rise of lithium-ion batteries in the transport and IT…

Electric car batteries tied to forced labor in China | O-T Lounge

As many environmentalists push for a quick transition to electric vehicles and clean energy, increasing ties have been found between the origin of the batteries needed to power the technology and forced labor in Chinese work camps. quote: According to the New York Times, while China produces 75 percent of the world’s lithium ion batteries, much …

Child labour behind smart phone and electric car batteries

Amnesty International and Afrewatch are calling on multinational companies who use lithium-ion batteries in their products to conduct human rights due